Brexit trade deal would allow US to ‘run riot’ with the NHS, warn campaigners
PUBLISHED: 14:42 01 March 2019 | UPDATED: 14:48 01 March 2019
2017 Getty Images
Donald Trump’s administration has published negotiating objectives for a post-Brexit deal which include demands for a block on state institutions - such as the NHS - discriminating against American companies when purchasing goods and services.
Become a Supporter
Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only continue to grow with your support.
The White House document also seeks “comprehensive market access” for American agricultural products through the reduction or removal of tariffs and the elimination of “unwarranted barriers” to food and drink imports.
Liam Fox’s trade department welcomed the paper, published by the office of US trade representative Robert Lighthizer, as a sign that Washington is keen to start talks soon after Brexit.
But Labour MP Jo Stevens, representing the People’s Vote campaign, said the proposed deal - which also requires the removal of restrictions on transfers of personal data - would turn the NHS into “a playpen for huge US corporate interests”.
“Donald Trump’s administration has now made it clear just what it will be demanding from the UK in return for a trade deal - and one of those things is that we let big US companies run riot in the NHS,” said Stevens.
Proposed measures would require that “US drug companies - the very corporations that have caused the opioids crisis in their home countries through reckless marketing and pressure on doctors - get full access to the NHS”, she warned.
The National Farmers’ Union also raised concerns over food safety and animal welfare standards.
“It is imperative that any future trade deals, including a possible deal with the USA, do not allow the imports of food produced to lower standards than those required of British farmers,” NFU president Minette Batters said.
“British people value and demand the high standards of animal welfare, environmental protection and food safety that our own farmers adhere to.
“These world-leading standards must not be sacrificed in the pursuit of reaching rushed trade deals.”
US companies have long complained that EU regulations limit American exports of food products such as chlorine-washed chicken, hormone-boosted beef and genetically modified crops.
Trump’s commerce secretary Wilbur Ross warned in 2017 that continued adherence to EU standards after Brexit could act as a “landmine” to UK hopes of a free trade deal with the States.
A Downing Street spokeswoman told the Press Association: “We have always been very clear that we will not lower our food standards as part of a future trading agreement.”
But Liberal Democrat MP Tim Farron, a supporter of the Best for Britain campaign for a new referendum, said: “It’s clear that the US ... wants to flood us with chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-pumped beef.
“But the British people won’t be force-fed low-quality products or a bad Brexit deal. That’s why we need a public vote.”
Scottish National Party MSP Gail Ross said the US government’s demands were a “direct threat to Scotland’s world-class food and drink sector”.
“This is yet another example of the huge damage Brexit is causing,” said Ross.
“But no matter how desperate the UK Government are they should not sacrifice food safety or our agriculture sector to placate Donald Trump.”
Become a Supporter
Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press with your support. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.Become a supporter