Banks accused of holding undisclosed meetings with Russians
PUBLISHED: 12:48 10 June 2018 | UPDATED: 15:36 12 June 2018
PA Archive/PA Images
The self-proclaimed 'bad boy of Brexit' Arron Banks has been accused of conducting a series of meetings with Russian officials.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism
The millionaire Brexit campaigner, who bankrolled the Leave.EU campaign, allegedly held several undisclosed meetings with Russian embassy officials and had discussions about a business deal involving six Russian goldmines.
Banks was introduced to the ambassador Alexander Yakovenko by a suspected Russian intelligence officer, according to The Sunday Times.
The paper said it had seen emails by Banks and Leave.EU communications chief Andy Wigmore showing they had repeated contacts with Russian officials to discuss matters of mutual interest throughout the EU referendum campaign and its aftermath.
The reports will raise fresh questions about whether the Kremlin sought to influence the outcome of the 2016 vote.
Asked about the report at the G7 summit in Quebec, Theresa May said: “I am sure that if there are any allegations that need investigation the proper authorities will do that.”
Banks, who last week announced he was pulling out of the Commons inquiry into fake news, accusing the MPs of a “witch hunt”, said he would now be giving evidence to the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee as planned on Tuesday.
According to the report, the emails showed Banks met Yakovenko on three occasions – having previously only acknowledged one encounter in 2015 – and made a visit to Moscow in February 2016 in the midst of the referendum campaign.
The paper said he and Wigmore had also had lunch with the ambassador in November 2016 – just three days after they and Nigel Farage had met Donald Trump in New York following his victory in the US presidential election.
They were said to have been introduced to Yakovenko by Alexander Udod – one of 23 suspected Russian intelligence officers subsequently ejected from the UK after the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury.
The ambassador was said to have proposed a business deal that would have involved them in the consolidation into one company of six Russian goldmines.
The emails were passed to The Sunday Times by journalist Isabel Oakeshott, Banks’ ghostwriter on The Bad Boys of Brexit, who is now writing a book with the Tory peer Lord Ashcroft on Russia’s use of “hybrid warfare” to influence British politics.
The paper said she came forward after she said her email accounts were “hacked”.
Writing in the paper, Oakeshott said: “Banks and Wigmore were shamelessly used by the Russians. Perhaps, the Englishmen did not mind. Banks and Wigmore genuinely sympathised – and continue to sympathise – with some of Putin’s political views.”
But Banks dismissed the claims, telling the paper: “I had two boozy lunches with the Russian ambassador and another cup of tea with him. Bite me. It’s a convenient political witch-hunt, both over Brexit and Trump.”
He told the paper that nothing had come of their discussions over the goldmine deal. “We didn’t profit from any business deals because I never pursued anything,” he said.
Banks, whose wife is Russian, acknowledged that he had made a “family trip” to Moscow in February 2016, but said “no meetings were had with anyone”.
He told the paper he had also disclosed details of his contacts with the Russians to US officials.
“We actually saw the suits from the American embassy who introduced us to the State Department to explain what had happened and then we briefed the Americans on our meetings with the Russians,” he said.
Wigmore told the paper: “We never offered any information to him (Mr Yakovenko) or any Russian any details of our (Brexit) campaign.”
There was no immediate response from Leave.EU.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.Become a supporter