Former Tory minister claims cost of coronavirus lockdown outweighed the benefits

PUBLISHED: 15:31 28 July 2020 | UPDATED: 15:36 28 July 2020

Baroness Neville-Rolfe in the House of Lords. Photograph: House of Lords.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe in the House of Lords. Photograph: House of Lords.

Archant

A former Tory minister has questioned the economic cost of the coronavirus lockdown - claiming the cost outweighed the benefits.

Become a Supporter

Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only continue to grow with your support.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe, who served as a business minister under Theresa May and was once a Tesco executive, challenged the government to outline what plans they had to ensure that fuller account was taken of the economic costs of any measures adopted to tackle the pandemic such as lockdowns.

Baroness Penn, responding on behalf of the government, pointed out the lockdown had been about protecting lives and controlling the virus.

She added that the government had provided unprecedented package of economic support, and was planning a “phased approach” to re-opening the economy to minimise the risk of a second peak of the virus.

Lady Neville-Rolfe said she welcomed the package of support, but said the UK experience in recent months showed “the costs of severe restrictions imposed for medical reasons are large and indeed much larger than the benefits”.


Have your say

Send your letters for publication to The New European by emailing letters@theneweuropean.co.uk and pick up an edition each Thursday for more comment and analysis. Find your nearest stockist here or subscribe to a print or digital edition for just £13. You can also join our readers' Facebook group to keep the discussion and debate going with thousands of fellow pro-Europeans.


She cited a paper entitled Living with Covid-19: balancing costs against benefits in the face of the virus which she said made a strong case that the recent lifting of lockdown restrictions had been justified and measures to counter any flare-up should be “carefully targeted, rather than general”.

Lady Penn said she was absolutely right and ministers wanted to use “all the tools available to us to implement a targeted response to any local outbreaks”.

She said the government would use the test and trace system to work with local authorities to contain the virus.

“National measures do remain a tool available to us but they are not one that we would want to use again,” Lady Penn added.

Last month an expert claims that the coronavirus death toll could have been halved if the lockdown was introduced a week earlier.

Become a Supporter

Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press with your support. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.

Become a supporter

You've seen the news, now discover the story

The New European is committed to providing in-depth analysis of the Brexit process, its implications and progress as well as celebrating European life.

Try 13 weeks for £20

Latest Articles

Most Read

latest issue

ANTI-BREXIT EVENTS

Find your nearest pro-European campaigning activities, talks, protests and events nationwide.