Deal or no deal? Why Britain must not walk away from Brexit talks
PUBLISHED: 13:40 04 April 2017 | UPDATED: 17:39 05 April 2017
PA Wire/PA Images
The Commons Brexit Committee wants the Government to prove how Britain would cope if the Prime Minister fails to get a deal on leaving the EU
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism
A parliamentary report has called on Theresa May to provide evidence to back up her claim that leaving the European Union without a trade deal would be “better than a bad deal”.
Here are some of the questions being asked about the “no deal” option:
• What kind of a trade deal do we have at the moment?
Single market arrangements allow businesses to trade goods freely across Europe without tariffs and under a single regulatory system. This has allowed Britain to grow and become one of the world most stable economies. The market in services is not yet complete but there are important agreements, such as “passporting” for financial firms to operate throughout Europe.
• Are these arrangements only for EU members?
A few non-EU members are part of the single market, including members of the European Economic Area like Norway and Iceland, as well as Switzerland, which has a series of bilateral agreements. But May has said she wants the UK to leave the single market, mainly to stop free movement of people.
• So what’s the deal for countries outside the single market?
They can face taxes and duties – known as tariffs – on goods and services exported to the EU. And they can also face non-tariff barriers, such as quotas for imports of certain products. They are also likely to be required to comply with EU regulations on product quality, safety, environmental protection and workers’ rights.
• Is there any way around this?
Yes. More than 50 countries have free trade agreements (FTAs) with the EU, allowing them varying degrees of access to the single market. But, and it is a rather big ‘but’, most relate mainly to goods, rather than the services which make up the bulk of the UK’s exports.
• So what is the PM looking for?
The Government is aiming for a comprehensive FTA, tailor-made for Britain, which offers “the freest and most frictionless trade possible in goods and services between the UK and the EU”. This would most likely take decades to negotiate, but Brexiteer ministers insist that it can be done within the two-year deadline.
• Why might we end up without a deal?
May insists she wants agreement, but has also warned that “no deal is better than a bad deal”. Many observers view this as a tactic to increase pressure on the EU to offer good terms. But ministers insist that they are preparing for the possibility that she could walk away from the negotiating table.
• What happens if we don’t get a deal?
Britain would fall back on the tariffs agreed at the World Trade Organisation. These are complex and vary from product to product – in 2013, the EU imposed average 2.3% tariffs on non-agricultural imports, but 10% on cars – but have the effect of making goods and services more expensive in EU markets and therefore less attractive to consumers, potentially hitting exports. Quotas could be imposed on imports from the UK. And Britain would also lose access to all the FTAs negotiated by the EU with other countries and may be forced to renegotiate them in order to keep trade flowing.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.Become a supporter