#McVeyFacts trends on Twitter after Brexiteer tweets false claim about EU
PUBLISHED: 20:16 11 March 2019 | UPDATED: 20:25 11 March 2019
PA Archive/PA Images
Former cabinet minister and Brexiteer MP Esther McVey has been to task on social media after tweeting and then deleting a false claim about the European Union.
Become a Supporter
Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only continue to grow with your support.
The former work and pensions secretary shared a tweet claiming all EU member states will “have to adopt the euro” after 2020 on her personal Twitter account, writing: “Are the public aware of this? and the many other things the EU has planned for its member states after 2020?”.
The tweet she shared, from the Brexiteer website Brexit Central, linked to a 2014 opinion piece which argued that “political union in the eurozone is an economic existential necessity”.
However, both Denmark and the UK have negotiated to remain outside the eurozone, in a similar way to how the UK is outside the Schengen zone of free movement and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Her tweet, which she has since deleted, caused uproar across the social network as McVey was accused of spreading misinformation.
Activist Femi Oluwole, who campaigns for a so-called People’s Vote on Brexit, tweeted: “Esther McVey published fake news saying the UK would have to join the Euro if we stayed in the EU.
“This is the same crap that floated around Facebook WEEKS AGO, and I debunked it BELOW, yet this former government secretary is still sharing lies. #McVeyFacts”
The hashtag #McVeyFacts was trending across the UK as Twitter users tried to outdo each other with outlandish “facts”.
“Are the public aware that after 2020 the first born male child must be named Ian and that because of their standardised EU birth certificate, shall henceforth be referred to as ‘Europe Ian’. #McVeyFacts,” quipped one Twitter user.
“Are the public aware that, by 2021, every school in every EU nation will be required to sing a song of allegiance to Jean Claude Juncker instead of holding an assembly? #McVeyFacts,” joked another.
McVey told the Press Association: “The truth is no one knows how the EU will change in the future and if the UK remains the changes it would undergo.
“For instance, if anyone said in the 1975 referendum on the common market this would lead to the EU with free movement of people and so many laws being decided by qualified majority voting, people would have said that was rubbish and untrue. Yet it happened.”
However, both free movement of workers and qualified majority voting were part of the European Common Market before the UK joined in 1973.
Steve Peers, professor of EU, human rights and world trade law at the University of Essex, said: “The basic framework of the EU can’t be changed without the consent of all its member states.
“The changes since 1975 were all approved by Acts of Parliament.”
McVey continued: “In the EU referendum when people talked about an EU army it was said it was a lie and yet it is now seriously being discussed.
“No one could have predicted in 1975 the common market would have become the EU super state and equally no one knows the future of the EU now.”
Peers added that “every member state has a veto or opt out from EU defence co-operation”.
McVey had earlier sought to backtrack on her initial tweet, writing: “From reading the comments, even if you don’t agree with the article I posted, I think we can all agree on one thing - we never want the UK to join the Euro. True or false? #True”
Become a Supporter
Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press with your support. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.Become a supporter