UK to have no say on EU decisions during Brexit transition under new guidelines
PUBLISHED: 15:24 29 January 2018 | UPDATED: 15:25 29 January 2018
Britain will have to obey the EU rulebook in full during a transition period after Brexit while having no voice in decision-making bodies, under proposals agreed by the remaining 27 member states.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism
In a brief meeting in Brussels, the EU27 gave their approval to new guidelines for chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier, ahead of talks expected to conclude in March.
Speaking ahead of the publication of Mr Barnier's new mandate, Downing Street acknowledged that "differences" remained between the views of London and Brussels on the nature of the transition, expected to last around two years from the official date of Brexit in March 2019.
In a statement released after the Brussels meeting, Bulgarian deputy prime minister Ekaterina Zaharieva said: "EU ministers have given a clear mandate to the Commission on what is the type of transition period that we envisage: full EU acquis [the body of EU law] to be applied in the UK and no participation in the EU institutions and decision-making.
"The 27 adopted the text speedily today and we hope an agreement on this with the UK can also be closed swiftly."
Mrs May's official spokesman told reporters that "there will naturally be some distance in the detail of our starting positions" for negotiations.
"I think there is broad agreement on the principle of an implementation period being in the interests of both sides, but on the specific detail you would expect there to be some differences," said the spokesman. "That is obviously what will be negotiated."
The spokesman gave no indication of where Number 10 expects the points of friction to arise during transition negotiations.
To the consternation of the Conservative Party's Hard Brexiteers, the government has already indicated it is willing to comply with most of the EU's demands to secure what ministers refer to as an "implementation period".
But Brexit secretary David Davis indicated in a speech last week that the UK would insist on a mechanism allowing it to challenge the application of any new EU laws which came into effect during the "implementation period".
And he said that Britain wanted to continue to enjoy the advantages during the transition of around 750 international agreements to which it was signed up by virtue of its EU membership.
The prime minister is facing increasingly vocal complaints from Leavers in her own party that she is preparing to deliver a Brexit "in name only".
And she came under attack from the Labour chairman of the Commons Exiting the EU committee, Hilary Benn, who said it was "extraordinary and unacceptable" that the Government had so far failed to spell out exactly what it wanted from Brexit negotiations.
Downing Street declined to comment on reports that German chancellor Angela Merkel had told reporters in a private meeting that whenever she asks Mrs May what she is seeking, the prime minister responded: "Make me an offer."
Mr Benn said: "We are now 19 months on from the referendum and neither Parliament nor the rest of EU are any the wiser about what the government actually wants from the Brexit negotiations. Extraordinary and unacceptable."
Mrs May met her Brexit "inner circle" of senior ministers including Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and Amber Rudd at Downing Street to discuss the UK's approach to negotiations.
In a series of tweets, hardline Eurosceptic John Redwood said: "Britain has fallen over backwards to please the EU. We now need to be tough and say 'do you want a trade deal or not?'
"Many of us want new borders, fishing and agriculture policies and the reduction of taxes the EU insists on where we do not agree. To get on with improving these we do not want a two-year so-called transitional period if that means we can't take control of our laws, borders and money."
In what appeared to be an encouragement to Mrs May to emulate Sir Winston Churchill, the former cabinet minister added: "The Darkest Hour is a moving reminder of how dire the UK position was in 1940, and how brave were the people and their new Prime Minister in deciding to fight on against the odds."
International trade secretary Liam Fox told Bloomberg News that pro-Brexit Tories "would be foolish to do anything to destabilise the government and the prime minister".
Dr Fox said Mrs May had shown the "resilience" needed to deliver Brexit, and added: "Ultimately we have to get an agreement that will please different wings of the Conservative Party but most importantly that is good for the country and delivers on what the electorate have instructed us to do."
Responding to the EU27's negotiating guidelines, CBI head of EU negotiations Nicole Sykes said: "The UK and EU are largely in agreement on a transition period but any differences, like the UK's role in regulatory bodies, must urgently be ironed out with an agreement signed and sealed by the end of March.
"A status quo, jobs-first transition deal can give firms of all sizes, here in the UK and across the rest of Europe, the immediate certainty they need to keep investing, so now is the time to get on with it."
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.Become a supporter