Jeremy Corbyn's offer to step in as caretaker PM branded 'nonsense' by Lib Dems
PUBLISHED: 08:12 15 August 2019 | UPDATED: 16:29 15 August 2019
PA Wire/PA Images
Jeremy Corbyn has been told that his suggestion he should be installed as a caretaker prime minister to prevent a no-deal Brexit under Boris Johnson has been branded a 'nonsense' idea by Jo Swinson.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism
The Labour leader's proposal would be "strictly time-limited" to seek an extension to the Article 50 process to delay the UK leaving the European Union past the October 31 deadline and call a general election.
Corbyn has asked Westminster's opposition leaders and key Tory rebels to support a no-confidence vote he plans to seek at the "earliest opportunity when we can be confident of success".
But the Liberal Democrats dismissed the Labour leader as being the right person to lead a temporary government, while Downing Street criticised him for planning to "overrule the referendum".
In a letter, Corbyn wrote: "This government has no mandate for no-deal, and the 2016 EU referendum provided no mandate for no-deal.
"I therefore intend to table a vote of no confidence at the earliest opportunity when we can be confident of success.
"Following a successful vote of no confidence in the government, I would then, as leader of the opposition, seek the confidence of the house for a strictly time-limited temporary government with the aim of calling a general election, and securing the necessary extension of Article 50 to do so."
Corbyn said Labour would campaign in that election for a second referendum on EU membership with the option to Remain being available to voters.
He will hope that the promise of his government only being temporary will be enough to secure the support of his critics who otherwise want to halt a no-deal.
But Jo Swinson quickly scuppered some of those hopes by saying he was the wrong politician for the job.
"Jeremy Corbyn is not the person who is going to be able to build an even temporary majority in the House of Commons for this task - I would expect there are people in his own party and indeed the necessary Conservative backbenchers who would be unwilling to support him.
"It is a nonsense," she said.
"This letter is just more red lines that are about him and his position and is not a serious attempt to find the right solution and build a consensus to stop a no-deal Brexit."
The SNP's Ian Blackford welcomed the Labour leader's letter and said the party would bring down the Tories in a no-confidence vote.
Plaid Cymru's Liz Saville Roberts also offered her cautious support, saying the party is open to a unity government regardless of who leads it, but that it must have "stopping Brexit" as its first priority.
Green Party MP Caroline Lucas, another recipient of the letter, also said she would back a no-confidence vote, but added that she wants Corbyn to guarantee Labour's support for another MP to lead a temporary government if his bid to govern fails.
Corbyn could secure his proposed temporary administration by winning the support of the House of Commons after defeating Boris Johnson with the majority of MPs backing a vote of no confidence in the government.
Then, as PM, he could table a motion for an early general election which would succeed with the support of two-thirds of the seats in the Commons, in the same fashion as Theresa May's doomed vote in 2017.
In an interview, Corbyn said it was "hard" to put a time limit on his proposed caretaker leadership, but said it would have to endure Article 50 negotiations with the EU and a general election.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.