Jeremy Hunt compares no-deal costs to bank bailout and everyone is confused

PUBLISHED: 14:19 01 July 2019 | UPDATED: 14:30 01 July 2019

Conservative leadership hopeful Jeremy Hunt speaking on Sky News' Sophy Ridge on Sunday. Picture: Sky News

Conservative leadership hopeful Jeremy Hunt speaking on Sky News' Sophy Ridge on Sunday. Picture: Sky News

Sky News

Jeremy Hunt has been pilloried for comparing the costs of a no-deal Brexit to the money spent bailing out banks after the 2008 financial crisis.

Become a Supporter

The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism

In a series of tweets devoted to the Tory leadership hopeful's spending plans, he justified having to put aside enormous support funds for key industries. "We spent just over £1 trillion bailing out the banks after the financial crisis," he argued. "So if we did it for the bankers then why wouldn't we do it what is needed for our fishermen and our farmers now?"

In the lengthy thread, he argued that the country must prepare seriously to make a no-deal Brexit a "credible threat" in the eyes of EU negotiators. His plans for this include a £6 billion relief fund for fishers and farmers.

But the £1 trillion tweet has prompted hundreds of head-scratching replies.

Numerous people pointed out that Brexit is an entirely voluntary crisis, unlike the financial crash.

"The big difference between the financial crash and Brexit is, the financial crash was something that unfortunately happened, while Brexit is a choice that we could still halt if we figured out it was going to cost £1 trillion," said Twitter user Nick Tyrone.

Others noticed that Hunt exaggerated the amount spent during the crash, with one councillor from Hunt's own party pointing out the inaccuracy.

"We most certainly did not spend £1 trillion bailing out the banks," tweeted the leader of Camden's Conservatives, Oliver Cooper.

A House of Commons briefing paper found that the banking crisis cost £23 billion of public money, and Hunt's £1 trillion figure is likely to refer to expenditure plus the value of government guarantees.

Some Twitter users were confused that the party of fiscal responsibility was suddenly making impassioned arguments for massive public spending. Ceasefire Magazine's Hicham Yezza tweeted: "Jeremy Hunt now getting confused over which Jeremy he is ..."

You may also want to watch:

But most comments were just in awe at the insanity of the entire situation and the arguments it is forcing the would-be leaders to make.

"It's all bonkers. Utterly bonkers," tweeted Gary Lineker.

Become a Supporter

The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.

Become a supporter

You've seen the news, now discover the story

The New European is committed to providing in-depth analysis of the Brexit process, its implications and progress as well as celebrating European life.

Try 13 weeks for £13

Latest Articles

Most Read

latest issue

ANTI-BREXIT EVENTS

Find your nearest anti-Brexit campaigning activities, talks, protests and events nationwide.

Newsletter Sign Up

The New European weekly newsletter
Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Our Privacy Policy