'Shocking failure of judgement' - Hunt criticised for 'Soviet Union' jibe
PUBLISHED: 12:47 01 October 2018 | UPDATED: 13:03 01 October 2018
Politicians have turned fire on Jeremy Hunt, after the foreign secretary compared the EU to the Soviet Union.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism
In his keynote speech to the Conservative party conference in Birmingham, Hunt accused Brussels of seeking to “punish” Britain for wanting to leave the EU and compared it to the USSR trying to stop its citizens leaving.
The comment was denounced as “unworthy of a British foreign secretary” by the former head of the UK’s diplomatic service, Lord Ricketts, while his successor as the Foreign Office’s permanent secretary, Sir Simon Fraser, described it as a “shocking failure of judgement”.
German Europe minister Michael Roth told the foreign secretary: “Sorry, Jeremy Hunt, the EU is no prison!”
And a European Commission spokesman said: “I would say, respectfully, that we would all benefit, and in particular foreign affairs ministers, from opening a history book from time to time. That’s the only comment I have.”
Meanwhile, Latvia’s ambassador to the UK retorted that the EU had brought her country “prosperity, equality, growth, respect” after decades in which the Soviet Union ruined the lives of its people.
And Estonia’s ambassador in London, Tiina Intelmann, described Hunt’s comments as “insulting” to those who lived under Soviet domination before the collapse of the communist regime in 1991.
In his speech, Hunt recalled a visit to Latvia, during which he observed how the Baltic state had developed into “a modern democracy, part of both Nato and the EU” after breaking free of the Soviet Union.
And he asked: “What happened to the confidence and ideals of the European dream? The EU was set up to protect freedom. It was the Soviet Union that stopped people leaving.
“The lesson from history is clear: if you turn the EU club into a prison, the desire to get out won’t diminish, it will grow, and we won’t be the only prisoner that will want to escape.”
Lord Ricketts, who was the Foreign Office’s most senior civil servant from 2006-10 before serving as national security adviser and ambassador to France, responded on Twitter: “This rubbish is unworthy of a British foreign secretary.
“The EU isn’t a Soviet-style prison. Its legal order has brought peace and prosperity after a century of war.
“Our decision to leave was always going to leave us worse off. The only punishment is the self-inflicted variety.”
And Sir Simon Fraser, who led Britain’s diplomats from 2010-15 and is now vice-chairman of foreign affairs at think-tank Chatham House, said: “I agree with Lord Ricketts, my predecessor as permanent secretary.
“Whatever you think about Brexit, shocking failure of judgment for British Foreign Secretary to compare European Union with Soviet Union.”
Latvian ambassador Baiba Braze said: “Soviets killed, deported, exiled and imprisoned 100 thousands of Latvia’s inhabitants after the illegal occupation in 1940, and ruined lives of 3 generations, while the EU has brought prosperity, equality, growth, respect.”
Intelmann said: “EU and USSR not comparable. Soviet regime was brutal, I lived under it, comparison is insulting.”
And the Czech Republic’s deputy foreign minister, Tomas Petricek, said Hunt’s comparison was “unfortunate”, adding: “The EU is really not the USSR.
“Our country has its experience of the Soviet sphere of influence. With Brussels we decide together on Europe, with Moscow decisions were made about us without us.”
Braze later appeared to play down any rift with Hunt, sending a second tweet thanking him for his “warm words and memories about his visit to Latvia and UK’s contribution to our freedom” in his speech.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.Become a supporter