Passing of Kinnock amendment labelled 'skulduggery' amidst Commons confusion
PUBLISHED: 10:58 05 September 2019 | UPDATED: 10:58 05 September 2019
A bill amendment requiring a vote on Theresa May's Withdrawal Agreement bill has passed in very odd circumstances, with some MPs crying foul.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism
The Kinnock amendment was added to the anti-no-deal bill being brought by opposition MPs, and was not expected to pass. But it did, because there were no tellers available on behalf of the 'no' vote.
There was a flurry of confusion amongst commentators after the amendment passed.
Labour MP Alex Sobel said there was "skulduggery", tweeting: "The amendment in the name of Stephen Kinnock didn't have a vote as the government didn't provide tellers to count.
"This meant the amendment went through although the No lobby was full. This wasn't an accident you can be assured there's some skulduggery going on."
The New Statesman's Stephen Bush has also concluded that it was a deliberate act of "chicanery" by the government, but there is still a lot of speculation.
Theresa May's bill, which was never voted on in anticipation of a loss, is the product of a new round of talks between the then-prime minister and opposition MPs. It includes several new or amended commitments, such as the maintaining of environmental commitments, maintaining workers' rights in par with the EU, and some attempt at keeping trade frictionless alongside the Single Market.
Who are the rebel opposition MPs calling for the return of Theresa May's deal?
The MPs supporting the Kinnock amendment come from mostly Labour Leave constituencies, and argued that a vote on May's deal would prevent a further extension which would "leave most of the country banging their head against a brick wall".
You may also want to watch:
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.Become a supporter