Parliament must defend itself to avoid Boris Johnson’s dog-whistle slogans controlling the narrative
PUBLISHED: 15:09 04 October 2019 | UPDATED: 15:13 04 October 2019
PA Wire/PA Images
Readers argue that, ahead of a general election, parliament must defend its actions to avoid Dominic Cummings and Boris Johnson controlling the narrative.
Become a Supporter
Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only continue to grow with your support.
The dog-whistle slogans which the Cummings-Gove-Johnson triumvirate used to distort the case for Brexit are being lined up ready for the next election.
By defining all parliamentary opposition as Remainers intent on thwarting Brexit they can use their 'parliament versus the people' campaign slogan with great effect.
So let us unite to deny them this simplistic untruth by constantly pointing out that the current parliament consists of no-deal Brexiteers on one side with have-a-deal Brexiteers and Remainers on the other.
We must thump home the message that parliament is accurately representing the divisions in the country and is only fighting to take back control and assert its sovereignty.
Paul Stein, Pickering
Boris Johnson's offensive language in the Commons is obviously a tactic to stoke up a 'parliament versus the people' general election.
How can parliament be against the people when it represents the people with, for example, one of its main roles being to examine and challenge the work of government on our behalf? Imagine what would happen if a no-deal Brexit does go ahead, damaging our economy and ruining lives and concerned MPs from all parties had not come together to try and stop it. Parliament would then be derided for not challenging it.
Roger Hinds, Coulsdon
You may also want to watch:
I am appalled by Boris Johnson's suggestion that Supreme Court judges should be vetted and face "accountability" from politicians. Our so-called prime minister is behaving like a petulant child, throwing his toys out of the pram in frustration over last week's setback to his plans.
But these toys are hand-grenades, which threaten the institutions and conventions on which British parliamentary democracy is based.
Catherine Rowett MEP, Norwich
In the spirit of 'dialling down' our overheated public discourse, I found the front cover of TNE #162 unhelpful. Boris Johnson is not a 'felon' nor has the government been found 'guilty' of anything.
The UK Supreme Court is not a criminal court but our highest constitutional court dealing with civil law matters. Its unanimous decision that the government's action in shutting down our sovereign parliament was unlawful protects us all.
These differences matter when a populist fervour is being deliberately whipped up, with all the risks ably pointed out in Matthew Flinders' article "Why Johnson could still have the last laugh". We on the Remain side should be careful not to feed the beast.
Susanna Reece, Oxford
- Send your letters for publication to email@example.com and read more by buying Thursday's newspaper each week.
Become a Supporter
Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press with your support. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.Become a supporter