What the Brexit-backing newspapers say about latest deal defeat
PUBLISHED: 07:33 13 March 2019 | UPDATED: 07:36 13 March 2019
Theresa May's second Brexit defeat has been assessed by the Brexit-backing newspapers - and they angrily claim it has left Britain's EU departure, her premiership and trust in parliament in peril.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism
“House of fools” is the verdict on the Daily Mail’s front page, with the paper saying inside that the “Tory wreckers will not be forgiven”.
The paper also accuses the DUP of “abusing their power by trashing the May plan” and calls Labour’s position “absurd and contradictory”.
“This was a black day for British democracy. No one can yet say what demons it may unleash. But we do know who to blame,” the Mail says.
The Daily Express suggests that any decision made by Parliament that blocks Britain leaving the EU, tries to seek a second option from voters, or significantly delays departure in the hope the national view of Brexit changes “will be treachery”.
“MPs must understand that the citizens of Britain voted to leave the institutions of the EU. If they reverse that in any way, there will be a crisis of trust in democracy greater than at any time in our history,” the paper says.
It says the PM is not to blame for the fiasco. It claims she was undone by a “fanatical EU bureaucracy” and “Remainer parliament that has sought to thwart the will of the British people”.
The Times says May has been left “on the brink”, adding: “She is ill equipped to lead the country out of what is a political and constitutional crisis without parallel in modern times.”
“Mrs May’s attempt at brinkmanship has failed. Without trust and authority it is hard to see what she has to offer, having been trounced twice,” the paper says.
It concludes that the Tories may now have to find a new leader in order to get Brexit over the line.
The Daily Telegraph says that Britain must leave the EU on March 29.
“That remains the default position under the law and, in the absence of a deal, we should leave without one,” the paper says.
It also claims there will be “disruption” from a no-deal Brexit “but not the catastrophe that has been predicted”.
Remaining in the EU would be a “betrayal of the referendum vote”, the consequences of which “would be felt for years to come”, it adds.
The Daily Mirror says the “killer blow” in the Commons means Brexit will not happen on March 29.
“That is the fault of the PM and warring Brexit MPs, so they must take responsibility instead of blaming others, facing the wrath of those who will feel badly let down,” the paper says.
It says the PM is now on “borrowed time” and “MPs, parties and people uniting to find common ground is a good way forward”.
The Guardian says a no-deal Brexit needs to be voted down by MPs on Wednesday “to stop ruinous fantasies taking hold in our politics”.
“That cabinet ministers would vote to transform the current political and constitutional crisis into an economic one for the sake of their careers shows how deeply corrupting Brexit is,” the paper writes.
The Guardian says delaying Brexit should give the UK long enough “to contemplate what Brexit means for this country”, rather than being “hustled out of the door by a Conservative party on the verge of a nervous breakdown”.
It suggests May’s defeat represents a “catastrophic failure by a -Parliament of pygmies”.
“This great country is in the grip of chaos which is terrifying families and crippling businesses. Our politicians should hang their heads in shame,” the paper says.
It adds that May’s deal “isn’t great” but “would have got Brexit done”, saying that if Brexiteers get a third chance at a deal they must accept it.
The Financial Times says May’s strategy “lies in ruins” and the PM must now pursue a new one, if she continues in office.
The paper also backs MPs taking no deal off the table, saying: “There should be no prevarication here. Letting Britain crash out of the EU - as the Brexit ultras advocate - is not fulfilling the result of the 2016 referendum.”
It adds that while a second referendum may be “divisive”, it would offer voters this time “a real choice, instead of the illusory Brexit they were sold in 2016”.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.Become a supporter