Theresa May’s failed gamble is set to scupper Brexit talks
PUBLISHED: 13:30 14 June 2017 | UPDATED: 13:30 14 June 2017
PA Wire/PA Images
Opportunism was the motive for the general election... and now we’ll pay the price.
Become a Supporter
Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only continue to grow with your support.
Theresa May’s election gamble has not paid off. She hoped that in holding a snap election she could secure a landslide Conservative majority. She has failed.
This election, dubbed the Brexit election, provided very little clarity and specific details on what Brexit negotiations would be and what a post-Brexit UK would look like.
Now, there will not be the “strong and stable” government by the time Brexit negotiations begin on June 19. That will have a big impact on Brexit.
The EU27 want to begin negotiations as soon as possible. They want a UK government with a clear mandate and a Prime Minister that has a clear indication of what he or she wants from Brexit. The Brexit clock started ticking when May triggered Article 50 in March. Taking six weeks out of the two-year Brexit negotiating window to conduct an election was risky, as it has eaten into the time available to deal with the EU. Now, with so much uncertainty about how the next government will be formed, more time will inevitably be lost.
Anything other than a single party government means another delay in Brexit negotiations.
It would be possible to request an Article 50 pause or extension but whether it will be approved by the EU27 is another matter. The Lisbon Treaty has no provision within it to provide this extension or pause mechanism so there is no obvious legal rule. This will be a political decision and will give an indication of the mood of the EU27 towards the UK.
Whether the UK is on course for a hard or soft Brexit will depend on the composition of the government but Article 50 is driven by the EU – the balance of power is with EU27.
In sum, the election result has massive potential to interrupt Article 50 talks. It could delay Brexit and has weakened the UK’s negotiating position. The next parliament will face the excruciating task of forming a government, and that government will need to navigate difficult decisions as it moves towards delivering Brexit to a deeply divided and polarised nation. All of this instability and uncertainty could mean that the electorate will probably be back at the polls before 2022.
Giving Article 50 notification in March and then holding an election in June has been shown to be misguided. It underlines how little Brexit mattered in May’s decision to hold this vote. The Brexit election was not about Brexit, it was political opportunism. And the electorate has noticed.
• Kathryn Simpson is a lecturer in politics and public services at Manchester Metropolitan University
• This article also appears at www.theconversation.com
Become a Supporter
Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press with your support. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.Become a supporter