Skip to main content

Hello. It looks like you’re using an ad blocker that may prevent our website from working properly. To receive the best experience possible, please make sure any ad blockers are switched off, or add https://experience.tinypass.com to your trusted sites, and refresh the page.

If you have any questions or need help you can email us.

Tory MPs insist Commons must approve Yemen aid cut as it ‘puts lives at risk’

James Cleverly said the international community is “pulling together” to restore permanent peace in the region - Credit: PA

Conservative MPs have demanded prime minister Boris Johnson gives them a Commons vote on moves to slash the UK’s aid contribution to war-torn Yemen.

Former cabinet minister David Davis warned the policy “puts lives at risk” and must receive prior approval from MPs.



The UK has pledged at least £87 million in aid, down from a promise of £160 million in 2020 and £200 million in 2019.

Labour accused the government of choosing to leave hundreds of thousands of Yemeni children to “starve” while several Tory backbenchers voiced their concerns over the plan.

Conservative former international development secretary Andrew Mitchell warned cutting the UK’s 0.7% aid commitment to 0.5% was a “strategic mistake with deadly consequences”.

Asking an urgent question in the Commons, Mitchell told foreign office minister James Cleverly: “Last night, he will have heard the United Nations general secretary tell him that for Yemen, and I quote, ‘Cutting aid is a death sentence. Cutting it by 50% is unconscionable’.

“As a senior and respected British official at the UN, Sir Mark Lowcock said ‘Millions of Yemeni children will now continue the slow, agonising and obscene process of starving to death’.”

He added: “We are a generous, decent country. The 0.7% is enshrined in law. This House must surely have a vote. We must all search our consciences.”

Conservative Davis said MPs must be given a breakdown of the 50% aid cuts to Yemen before the Budget votes next week.

Davis said: “There is a strong convention that before government undertakes a policy which puts lives at risk it gets prior approval from this House.

“You can’t make a 50% cut in this budget without cutting into the crisis and healthcare support, thereby putting at least 100,000 children’s lives at risk.

“Will (Cleverly) guarantee that before the Budget votes are held next week we can have a written statement giving a breakdown of the cuts made this year in the aid budget, and undertaking that no more cuts will be undertaken unless and until this House approves it?”

Cleverly replied: “The convention that (Davis) refers to I’m not completely sure is relevant in this situation.

“The foreign secretary has said before we are looking very carefully at what is required by law. The legislation envisaged that 0.7% target may not be met in a particular year in light of economic and fiscal circumstances, and the legislation provides for reporting to parliament in the event that the target is not met.”

Fellow Conservative former cabinet minister Damian Green said legislation allowed the government to miss the 0.7% target during an emergency “but not to plan to miss it for an indefinite number of years ahead”.

He continued: “So can (Cleverly) give a commitment today that further cuts won’t be made until that necessary legislation promised by ministers to this House to enact this policy has been put to a vote so that this House can express a view?”

Cleverly replied: “The foreign secretary, as I have said, is looking carefully at the requirements of the legislation and I can assure him from this position at the despatch box that the government is well able to listen to the mood of the House without the need for legislation on this issue.”

Conservative Anthony Mangnall (Totnes) said: “The minister just started off his remarks by saying that money matters and, yes, it does, but what this cut represents is a cut to projects, a cut to aid, a cut to assistance that is going to put lives in jeopardy.

“Now if the government is so reassured by its position then I suggest it brings a vote to the House on this issue and they can truly gauge the strength of feeling on this issue.

“We have a moral duty to lead on this issue and I hope (Cleverly) will consider bringing a vote before it is too late.”

Cleverly said foreign secretary Dominic Raab was “looking at the legal requirements around the situation”.

The minister said: “I completely understand his passion but I would remind him and the House we remain one of the largest donors to this humanitarian crisis.”

Speaking during Foreign Office questions, shadow international development secretary Preet Kaur Gill said: “The actions of this government yesterday betrayed hundreds of thousands of Yemeni children as he chose to leave them to starve.”

Hello. It looks like you’re using an ad blocker that may prevent our website from working properly. To receive the best experience possible, please make sure any ad blockers are switched off, or add https://experience.tinypass.com to your trusted sites, and refresh the page.

If you have any questions or need help you can email us.